Legal Opinion

Dodds v. Bucknum

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 20, 1963No. Civ. 26395PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFox, P. J.

Plaintiff, a guest in defendant’s motor vehicle, brought this action to recover damages for personal injuries she sustained in an accident. She charges defendant with wilful misconduct. Defendant has appealed from an adverse judgment. Plaintiff has filed a cross-appeal on the tueory that the trial court improperly disallowed certain medical expenses that she incurred on the ground that these expenses had been paid by defendant’s insurance carrier.

Defendant’s Appeal

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prevailing party and giving plaintiff the benefit of every reasonable…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Anheuser-Busch, Inc. v. StarleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Laurenzi v. VranizanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Severson v. Milwaukee Automobile InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Parsons v. FullerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Goncalves v. Los Banos Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1962

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Helfend v. Southern California Rapid Transit DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Yarrington v. ThornburgSupreme Court of Delaware · 1964
  3. Krusi v. Bear, Stearns & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1983
  4. Renda v. NevarezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
  5. Hellman v. Great American InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API