McFate v. Zuckerman
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtJennings, J.
This is an appeal by the plaintiff from a judgment in his favor in the amount of $25,000. The sole ground of the appeal is inadequacy of damages.
Plaintiff instituted this action to recover from defendants the sum of $148,880.55 damages alleged to have been suffered by him as the result of certain false and fraudulent representations made to him by defendants Zuckerman and Gordon whereby he was induced to exchange ranch property at Paso Robles, California, for an apartment house in the city of Los Angeles owned by defendant Zuckerman. The false representations upon which it is alleged that…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hines v. BrodeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
- In Re Estate of HigginsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- Barbour v. FlickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Holland v. McCarthyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
- Gilbert v. PeckCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Newman v. Los Angeles Transit LinesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
- Perry v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
- Alexander v. McDonaldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
- Reeder v. HoagCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- Woebbe v. SperryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.