Legal Opinion

A & H Corp. v. City of Bridgeport

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided April 29, 1980PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtArthur H. Healey, J.

The six individual plaintiffs, as citizens of this state, brought this action, pursuant to General Statutes § ISa-lOS, 1 seeking to have the court order the defendant city of Bridgeport to pave and maintain properly Serpentine Road as a public highway in that city. The trial court found that Serpentine Road was not a public highway and therefore denied the relief sought under § 13a-103. Prom the judgment rendered, the plaintiffs have appealed to this court.

The trial court based its decision on the following relevant facts: According to the map placed in evidence by the plaintiffs, Serpentine…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Town of Derby v. AllingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1873
  2. Morris v. CostaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
  3. Lynch v. Town of West HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1974
  4. Mihalczo v. Borough of WoodmontSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
  5. Meshberg v. Bridgeport City Trust Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1980

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. State v. SharpeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
  2. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. MurphySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
  3. Rose v. Freedom of Information CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
  4. Rubin v. RubinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
  5. Smith v. Zoning Board of Appeals of the Town of GreenwichSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API