Legal Opinion

Borgwardt v. State

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided October 21, 1997No. 96-249PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MACY, Justice.

Appellant Carl Borgwardt appeals from the judgment and sentence which the district court entered after he conditionally pleaded nolo contendere to a charge of possession with intent to deliver a controlled substance.

We affirm.

ISSUES

Borgwardt presents two related issues for our review:

ISSUE I

The evidence obtained during the war-rantless search of [Borgwardt]’s vehicle should have been suppressed as it was obtained without a warrant and does not fall within the “plain view’ exception to the warrant requirements of the United States and Wyoming constitutions.

ISSUER

The evidence…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Neilson v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Gronski v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1996
  3. State v. PurserCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1992
  4. People v. FortuneSupreme Court of Colorado · 1997

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. McChesney v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Dettloff v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Vassar v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Burgos-Seberos v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1998
  5. McKenney v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2007

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API