Legal Opinion

People v. Fortune

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided January 13, 1997No. 96SA345PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Scott

In this interlocutory appeal, we review an order of the trial court suppressing evidence obtained pursuant to a search warrant. The affidavit supporting the search warrant did not include information related to the child-victim’s background prior to the incident in question. The trial court concluded that the warrant was not supported by probable cause because the affidavit, which omitted background information relating to the child-victim’s credibility without corroboration of his allegations, was substantially misleading. Because the information omitted was not material and because…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. United States v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. State v. SivriSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
  4. Hooks v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1980
  5. People v. UnruhSupreme Court of Colorado · 1986

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Borgwardt v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Feigin v. Digital Interactive Associates, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1999
  3. People v. EirishColorado Court of Appeals · 2007
  4. People v. MastersColorado Court of Appeals · 2001
  5. People v. MendezColorado Court of Appeals · 1997

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API