Orsinger v. Schoenfeld
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
POPE, Justice.
Appellants are landowners and homeowners who filed a suit against Chas. M. Schoenfeld and Olmos Rock Products, Inc., to permanently enjoin an alleged nuisance. The trial court sustained a plea in abatement to the appellants’ original petition, and they have appealed. The trial court heard no evidence.
The plea in abatement stated that Article 4644, Vernon’s Ann.Civ.Stats., forbade suits to enjoin subsurface drilling or mining operations unless the respondent is shown to be incapable of responding in damages, and that the suit was prematurely brought because it only asserted…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Spence v. FenchlerTexas Supreme Court · 1915
- Heinatz v. AllenTexas Supreme Court · 1949
- Marvel v. MerrittSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Burdick v. DillonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1906
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Klostermann v. Houston Geophysical CompanyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1958
- Clear Creek Independent School District v. Commissioner of Education of StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1989
- Conner v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1968
- Allen v. Mauro, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1986
- Vera v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1954
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.