Legal Opinion

Klostermann v. Houston Geophysical Company

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided July 2, 1958No. 13366PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

POPE, Justice.

Plaintiffs, Fritz Klostermann and Chester Johnson, sued Houston Geophysical Company for damages they claim that defendant did to their homes when it performed seismographic operations in connection with its mineral explorations. The trial court sustained exceptions to plaintiffs’ pleadings, which asserted a cause of action grounded solely upon liability without fault. Defendant urged and here insists that damages resulting from seismographic operations must, in Texas, be grounded upon negligence. The basic question before the Court is whether in such operations Texas follows or…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Clarendon Land Investment Agency Co. v. McClelland Bros.Texas Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Gainesville, Henrietta & Western Railway Co. v. HallTexas Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Turner v. Big Lake Oil Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Booth v. . R., W. O.T.R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1893
  5. Elliff v. Texon Drilling. Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1948

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Doddy v. Oxy USA, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
  2. Railroad Commission of Texas v. ManzielTexas Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Harper v. Regency Development Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1981
  4. Kushner v. Dravo Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1959
  5. Moran Corporation v. MurrayCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1964

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API