Conner v. Smith
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GREEN, Chief Justice.
This is an appeal from a judgment enjoining appellants, defendants in the trial court, from the continued construction and the operation of a proposed hide plant on their property just outside the city limits of Wharton, Wharton County, Texas. The case was tried without a jury, and no separate findings of facts or conclusions of law were requested. The following fact findings were contained in the decree:
“And it appearing to the Court that the operation of the proposed plant would produce odors disagreeable to persons of ordinary sensibilities which said odors…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Storey v. Central Hide & Rendering Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1950
- Hill v. BrownTexas Commission of Appeals · 1922
- G., H. S.A. Ry. Co. v. DegroffTexas Supreme Court · 1909
- Mitchell v. HancockCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1917
- O'Daniel v. LibalCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1946
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Inwood Forest Community Improvement Ass'n v. R. J. S. Development Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1982
- Holubec v. Brandenberger, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2006
- McAshan v. River Oaks Country Club, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1982
- Williams v. WhittenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1970
- David Holubec and Mary Holubec v. Carl Brandenberger, Individually and as Next Friend of Payton Brandenberger and Carson Brandenberger Kathy Brandenberger First Mason II, Ltd., Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2006
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.