Legal Opinion

Reich v. Cominco Alaska, Inc.

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided October 4, 2002No. S-9717PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

EASTAUGH, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

Geri Reich sued her former employer, Cominco Alaska, Inc., alleging that it subjected her to a hostile work environment at the Red Dog Mine. The mine was operated by Comineo but owned by NANA Regional Corporation. Alaska Rule of Civil Procedure 4T(c)(12) exeludes prospective jurors who have a financial interest in the litigation. Does this rule apply to stockholders of a corporation, such as NANA, which is not a party to the lawsuit but which may be financially affected by the verdict? We conclude that it does, and hold that the superior court did not…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Kerry Ellison v. Nicholas F. Brady, Secretary of the TreasuryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  2. Louvenia Hall v. Bodine Electric CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
  3. Cuddyer v. Stop & Shop Supermarket Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2001
  4. Malvo Ex Rel. Malvo v. J. C. Penney Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1973
  5. Richards v. CH2M Hill, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2001

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Mitchell v. Teck Cominco Alaska Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Sowinski v. WalkerAlaska Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Jackson v. American Equity Insurance Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Petrolane Inc. v. RoblesAlaska Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Crittell v. BingoAlaska Supreme Court · 2004

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API