Legal Opinion

Parker v. Beasley

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided January 10, 1936No. 4065PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRICE, Justice.. Upon motion for a rehearing, it is thought best to withdraw the original opinion. It is accordingly withdrawn and the following substituted:

This action is on a promissory note signed by appellee Sarah Virginia Beasley and her deceased husband (the other appellees are their children) and to foreclose a mortgage, upon real estate securing it. The land in suit was sold by James H. Parker to G. R. Beasley and conveyed by a deed warranting against encumbrances, and the note was given as part of the purchase price. At the time the deed was executed, there were back taxes and water…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Field v. . the Mayor, C. of New-YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1852
  2. Greene County v. Southern Surety Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  3. Barton v. GrayMichigan Supreme Court · 1885
  4. Peters v. BowmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  5. Laas v. SeidelTexas Supreme Court · 1902

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Pillsbury v. BlumenthalNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Maples v. HortonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  3. Quality Chiropractic, PC v. Farmers InsuranceNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2002
  4. In Re TriggNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Clovis National Bank v. CallawayNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1961

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API