Legal Opinion

Maples v. Horton

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 29, 1954No. 599PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDenny, J.

This appeal requires the determination of two questions: (1) Do the covenants and restrictions in the deeds for lots sold by the developer, Frank Maples, negative a general plan or scheme for the development of the area of land in question for residential purposes? (2) If so, may the plaintiff enforce such restrictions as personal covenants? In our opinion the answer to the first question must be in the affirmative, and to the second question, in the negative.

The law generally applicable to a plan or scheme for imposing restrictions upon land for particular purposes is succinctly stated in 26…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Davis v. RobinsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  2. Davis v. . RobinsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  3. Higdon v. JaffaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  4. Craven County v. First-Citizens Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  5. Warner v. FlackIllinois Supreme Court · 1917

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Raintree Corp. v. RoweCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
  2. McCotter v. BarnesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
  3. Palermo v. AllenArizona Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Logan v. SprinkleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  5. Shuford v. Asheville Oil CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API