Legal Opinion

Republic Insurance Co. v. Davis

Texas Supreme Court

Decided June 30, 1993No. D-2369PublishedCited by 171 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ENOCH, Justice.

This mandamus action calls for the resolution of two issues. First, does the “offensive use” waiver, enunciated by this court in Ginsberg v. Fifth Court of Appeals, 686 S.W.2d 105 (Tex.1985), apply to the attorney-client privilege? Second, does the privilege for party communications extend to subsequent litigation? We conclude that the Ginsberg “offensive use” waiver, while potentially applicable to the attorney-client privilege, does not apply in this case. We also conclude that the party communication privilege does not extend to any lawsuit which does not involve…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Walker v. PackerTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Hearn v. RhayDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 1975
  4. West v. SolitoTexas Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Ginsberg v. Fifth Court of AppealsTexas Supreme Court · 1985

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by171 opinions

  1. Johnson & Higgins of Texas, Inc. v. Kenneco Energy, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Huie v. DeShazoTexas Supreme Court · 1996
  3. In Re Ford Motor Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Vickery v. VickeryTexas Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Ford Motor Co. v. LeggatTexas Supreme Court · 1995

166 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API