Republic Insurance Co. v. Davis
Texas Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ENOCH, Justice.
This mandamus action calls for the resolution of two issues. First, does the “offensive use” waiver, enunciated by this court in Ginsberg v. Fifth Court of Appeals, 686 S.W.2d 105 (Tex.1985), apply to the attorney-client privilege? Second, does the privilege for party communications extend to subsequent litigation? We conclude that the Ginsberg “offensive use” waiver, while potentially applicable to the attorney-client privilege, does not apply in this case. We also conclude that the party communication privilege does not extend to any lawsuit which does not involve…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Walker v. PackerTexas Supreme Court · 1992
- Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Hearn v. RhayDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 1975
- West v. SolitoTexas Supreme Court · 1978
- Ginsberg v. Fifth Court of AppealsTexas Supreme Court · 1985
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by171 opinions
- Johnson & Higgins of Texas, Inc. v. Kenneco Energy, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1998
- Huie v. DeShazoTexas Supreme Court · 1996
- In Re Ford Motor Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1998
- Vickery v. VickeryTexas Supreme Court · 1999
- Ford Motor Co. v. LeggatTexas Supreme Court · 1995
166 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.