Legal Opinion

Ginsberg v. Fifth Court of Appeals

Texas Supreme Court

Decided March 6, 1985No. C-3248PublishedCited by 172 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GONZALEZ, Justice.

This is a mandamus proceeding brought to contest the authority of the court of appeals to issue a mandamus directing the trial court to cease discovery into certain allegedly privileged matters.

The primary issue is whether a plaintiff has the right to use the psychotherapist-patient privilege offensively to shield information which would be material and relevant to the defendant’s defense of claims made against him by the Plaintiff. We disapprove of such a use and conditionally grant the writ.

Underlying Facts

Reuben M. Ginsberg is an attorney. Over the years, he had done…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Jampole v. TouchyTexas Supreme Court · 1984
  2. West v. SolitoTexas Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Ex Parte AbellTexas Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Clark v. District Court, Second Judicial District, City & County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1983
  5. Jo Ann Lyons v. Wilbur R. Johnson, Jo Ann Lyons v. F. J. Delarios, Jo Ann Lyons v. F. J. DelariosCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by172 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Fourth Court of AppealsTexas Supreme Court · 1985
  2. EI Du Pont De Nemours & Co. v. RobinsonTexas Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Gammill v. Jack Williams Chevrolet, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Broders v. HeiseTexas Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Dickens v. Court of Appeals for the Second Supreme Judicial District of TexasCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1987

167 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API