Legal Opinion

Donald Wayne Sumrall, Joe Jerrell Crocker and Raymond Claude Nabors v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided May 9, 1966No. 8374-8376PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MURRAH, Chief Judge.

Appellants jointly appeal from judgments and sentences after a jury trial on an indictment jointly charging them with armed robbery of a federally insured bank in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113(d).

The evidence of guilt is overwhelming. One of the confessed participants and co-defendants testified to the plans and execution of the robbery and implicated each of the appellants as an active participant. There was other direct and circumstantial proof of guilt. The only point on appeal is whether the trial court erroneously refused to strike as “unresponsive, prejudicial and…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Michelson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  3. Fahy v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Bollenbach v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  5. Marshall v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. United States v. Daniel Bozza, Charles Mulhearn, Ronald Jones, Michael Pizzo, Salvatore Guarnieri, Anthony Delutro, A/K/A Tony WestCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1966
  2. United States v. Melvin JoeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
  3. William K. Parker v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
  4. Patton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1998
  5. Donald Wayne Sumrall, Joe Jerrell Crocker and Raymond Claud Nabors v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1967

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API