Legal Opinion

Donald Wayne Sumrall, Joe Jerrell Crocker and Raymond Claud Nabors v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided September 6, 1967No. 9417-9419_1PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MURRAH, Chief Judge.

When this case was first before us, we reversed and remanded solely on the prejudicial effect of a reference to the appellants’ prior “records”. Sumrall et al. v. United States, 10 Cir., 360 F.2d 311. A retrial resulted in a second conviction on substantially the same proof, the sufficiency of which is not questioned. The issue presented here for the first time is the legality of the arrest and search of the appellants and their female companion and the admissibility of evidence obtained by those searches.

The unrebutted evidence pertinently reflects that in February, 1964,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  3. Warden, Maryland Penitentiary v. HaydenSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. McDonald v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  5. Donald R. Elbel v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1966

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Eduardo Amador-Gonzalez v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968
  3. Cornelius Fullbright v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1968
  4. Charles Edward Matthews, Ezekiel Brown and Raymond Cook v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
  5. State v. TorresNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1970

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API