William K. Parker v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
DUNIWAY, Circuit Judge:
Parker and a co-defendant, Myers, were convicted of robbing a federally insured savings and loan association (18 U.S.C. § 2113(a)), and Parker appeals. We affirm.
Parker does not argue that there is not sufficient evidence to support the conviction. Our examination of the record persuades us that the evidence is more than sufficient. We will therefore state only so much of the facts as seems necessary to elucidate our disposition of the various arguments that he makes. We consider each argument separately.
1. Separate trial.
The three defendants 1 were tried together.…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Stovall v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Marshall v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- United States v. GaineySupreme Court of the United States · 1965
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by101 opinions
- Johnson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
- United States v. RoselliCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
- United States v. Enrico Campanale and Donald Matthews, United States of America v. Mike GrancichCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- United States v. BrightCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
- United States v. John DoeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
96 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.