Parker v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HORN, Judge.
The plaintiff, Verlene L. Parker, filed her complaint pro se. Although the submitted papers are hard to follow, as is discussed below, plaintiff is entitled to liberal construction of the pleadings by the court. The court construes plaintiffs claim to be against the United States for purposes of its review. All claims in the United States Court of Federal Claims must have “the United States designated as the party defendant....” Rule 10(a) of the Rules of the United States Court of Federal Claims (RCFC).
Ms. Parker appears to allege that the government took her property…
2Cases cited47 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Floyd v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
- Olivier Plantation, LLC v. St. Bernard ParishDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2010
- Bridget Allen v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
- Mandry v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2023
- Parker v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.