Legal Opinion

Floyd v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided February 24, 2016No. 15-793CPublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pro Se Plaintiff; Lack of Jurisdiction; Failure to State a Claim; Patent; Statute of Limitations; Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis; 28 U.S.C. § 1498; RCFC 12(b)(1); RCFC 12(b)(6)

OPINION AND ORDER

SWEENEY, Judge

On July 27, 2015, Herbert R. Floyd (“plaintiff’), appearing pro se, filed a complaint and an application to proceed informa pauperis. In his complaint, plaintiff alleges that the New York City Police Department (“NYPD”) infringed his patent for keyless vehicle entry fingerprint technology and seeks monetary damages pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 271 (2012). Defendant filed a motion to…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Amir v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2021
  2. Bennett v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2018
  3. Bondyopadhyay v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2020
  4. Brestle v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2018
  5. Double Lion Uchet Express Trust v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2020

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API