Legal Opinion
Parker v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided July 13, 2010No. 10-73LPublished
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
HORN, Judge.
FINDINGS OF FACT
The pro se plaintiff, Verlene L. Parker, has filed a motion to reconsider the decision issued by this court which dismissed plaintiffs complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted and for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.1 See Parker v. United States, 93 Fed.Cl. 159 (2010). Ms. Parker asserts that this court cannot dismiss her complaint for lack of jurisdiction. She writes that, “Mich § 292 states that the Court of Claims is the proper forum in which to seek relief in the form of damages where [the] Plaintiff alleges already…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Caldwell, Iii v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
- Yuba Natural Resources, Inc. v. The United States, Defendant/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
- Fru-Con Construction Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1999
- Amado v. Microsoft Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.