Legal Opinion

Mandry v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided March 27, 2023No. 23-281Published

1Opinion of the Court

In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 23-281 Filed: March 27, 2023 JAVIER MANDRY Plaintiff, v. THE UNITED STATES, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER TAPP, Judge. Pro se Plaintiff Javier Mandry (“Mr. Mandry”) 1 brings this action seeking $5 million in damages and other relief. (Compl. at 1, 3, ECF No. 1; Civil Cover Sheet at 1, ECF No. 1-1). Mr. Mandry’s allegations are extensive, but the Court understands Mr. Mandry to allege that the Puerto Rico Oversight, Management, and Economic Stability Act (“PROMESA Act”) 2 improperly allocated Puerto Rican taxpayer funds and violated…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  3. McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  4. Jan's Helicopter Service, Inc. v. Federal Aviation AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
  5. Roynell Joshua v. The United States, on MotionCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API