Legal Opinion

City of St. Petersburg v. Austrino

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 9, 2005No. 2D02-5802PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

898 So.2d 955 (2005)

CITY OF ST. PETERSBURG, Appellant,

v.

Donald AUSTRINO and Maria Austrino, his wife, Appellees.

No. 2D02-5802.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

February 9, 2005.

Rehearing Denied April 20, 2005.

John C. Wolfe, City Attorney, and Deborah Glover-Pearcey, Assistant City Attorney, St. Petersburg, for Appellant.

Marcus A. Castillo of Haas & Castillo, P.A., Clearwater, for Appellees.

CASANUEVA, Judge.

The City of St. Petersburg appeals a jury finding of liability for false arrest and an award of damages of $45,000, for which the City was found to be ninety percent…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  5. Beck v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1964

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Willingham v. City of OrlandoDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006
  2. Miami-Dade County v. AsadDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012
  3. Winston Johnson v. Barnes & Noble BooksellersCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2006
  4. Douglas v. United StatesDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2011
  5. Whittington v. Town of SurfsideDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2007

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API