Legal Opinion

Winston Johnson v. Barnes & Noble Booksellers

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided January 27, 2006No. 04-16113PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Per curiam

Barnes & Noble Booksellers, Inc. appeals the denial of its motion for a new trial after a jury verdict finding that Barnes & Noble falsely imprisoned Winston Johnson. The jury awarded Johnson $117,000 for emotional pain and mental anguish. Barnes & Noble argues that it is entitled to a new trial because the district court erroneously refused to instruct the jury with Barnes & Noble’s proposed jury instruction on breach of the peace. Barnes & Noble also argues that the jury award of $117,000 was excessive.

BACKGROUND

Johnson’s lawsuit arose from an incident at a Barnes & Noble store while he was…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Union Pacific Railway Co. v. BotsfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  3. Bould v. TouchetteSupreme Court of Florida · 1977
  4. Lassitter v. Intern. Union of Op. Engin.Supreme Court of Florida · 1977
  5. Bearint Ex Rel. Bearint v. Dorel Juvenile Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Garcia v. Carnival Corp.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2012
  2. Harder v. EdwardsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015
  3. Midlevelu, LLC v. ACI Information GroupCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2021
  4. Kenneth Kerrivan v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2020
  5. Cordoves v. Miami-Dade CountyDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2015

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API