Legal Opinion

Hiller v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided March 7, 1949PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilkins, J.

The plaintiff appeals from an order sustaining a demurrer to the declaration and from an order for judgment for the defendant. The case originated as a suit in equity and was amended into an action at law on the plaintiff’s motion. The declaration does not state to what division of actions it belongs. See G. L. (Ter. Ed.) c. 231, §§ 1; 7, First. The plaintiff contends that the action sounds in tort, and we consider the case on that footing. The demurrer assigns numerous grounds. If any ground is good, it will be enough to dispose of the appeal. Ratté v. Forand, 299 Mass. 185, 187. Hogan v.…

2Cases cited49 opinions

  1. Travis v. . Knox Terpezone Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1915
  2. Keljikian v. Star Brewing Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
  3. Casey v. . KastelNew York Court of Appeals · 1924
  4. Codman v. BeaneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942
  5. Stuart v. SargentMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Hayeck v. Metropolitan District CommissionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1957
  2. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Tennessee Public Service CommissionTennessee Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Mastrullo v. RyanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1952
  4. Channel Fish Co. v. Boston Fish Market Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1971
  5. De Gategno v. De GategnoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1957

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API