Legal Opinion

Codman v. Beane

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided December 29, 1942PublishedCited by 55 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRonan, J.

This is an action of contract in which the plaintiff seeks, in the first count of her declaration, to recover the balance due on a written contract to pay the plaintiff $10,000, and, in the second count, the balance due on the purchase price of shares of stock sold to the defendant. The trial judge found for the plaintiff on each count. The defendant appealed from an order of the Appellate Division dismissing the report.

The judge found that the defendant, with others, became interested, in 1933, in a corporation which had acquired the right to use a name that has become well known in the…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Bresnick v. HeathMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
  2. Castano v. LeoneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
  3. Memishian v. PhippsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942
  4. Dolham v. PetersonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
  5. Gibbons v. DenoncourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by55 opinions

  1. Liberatore v. Town of FraminghamMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
  2. Mastercraft Wayside Furniture Co. v. Sightmaster Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1955
  3. In re LoebMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
  4. E. A. Strout Realty Agency, Inc. v. GarganMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1952
  5. First National Stores Inc. v. H. P. Welch Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API