Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Hayeck v. Metropolitan District Commission

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided January 31, 1957PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilkins, C.J.

The petitioners, owners of a parcel of land at 6 Otis Place, Boston, bring this petition, purportedly under the State administrative procedure act, G. L. (Ter. Ed.) c. 30A, inserted by St. 1954, c. 681, § 1, to review a decision of the metropolitan district commission denying an application for leave to construct a rear driveway entrance to an abutting way designated on a plan annexed to the petition as “Service Road (formerly Embankment Road) ” and located in the Charles River Reservation “within the jurisdiction of the metropolitan district commission.” A demurrer to the petition was…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. United States v. CarmackSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Rindge Co. v. County of Los AngelesSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  3. Joslin Manufacturing Co. v. City of ProvidenceSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  4. Bragg v. WeaverSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  5. Bailey v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Milligan v. Board of Registration in PharmacyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1965
  2. Cambridge Electric Light Co. v. Department of Public UtilitiesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1973
  3. Moskow v. Boston Redevelopment AuthorityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1965
  4. City of Newton v. Department of Public UtilitiesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1959
  5. Fairbairn v. Planning Board of BarnstableMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1977

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API