Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Tennessee Public Service Commission
Tennessee Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice BuRNett
On November 10, 1954, the Telephone Company filed Avith the Commission a schedule of increased rates and charges to become effective on December 10,1954. These proposed rates and charges were based on the Telephone Company’s operations, costs, conditions, etc., for the year preceding June 30,1954. It proposed by these rates to get an additional gross revenue of $9,800,000 annually or additional net revenues of $4,435,000 annually. Obviously, and of necessity, its contention was that tbis was necessary so that it have a fair rate of return upon the fair value of its properties.
At common law a…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Crowell v. BensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Federal Power Commission v. Hope Natural Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Smyth v. AmesSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Prentis v. Atlantic Coast Line Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Bluefield Water Works & Improvement Co. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- CF Industries v. Tennessee Public Service CommissionTennessee Supreme Court · 1980
- Tennessee Cable Television Ass'n v. Tennessee Public Service CommissionCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1992
- Sun Oil Company v. Federal Power CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1959
- Pack v. Royal-Globe Insurance CompaniesTennessee Supreme Court · 1970
- Kittrell v. KittrellCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1966
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.