Legal Opinion

Stuart v. Sargent

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided July 1, 1933PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLummus, J.

The plaintiffs having waived their claim, made in their bill, to fifty shares of stock of the American Telephone and Telegraph Company, the only question argued is whether the defendant can maintain his counterclaim, included in his answer under Rule 32 of the Superior Court (1932), for the amount of dividends received by the plaintiffs on that stock while it stood on the books of the corporation in the names of the plaintiffs.

The plaintiffs had a margin account with the banking and brokerage firm of Curtis and Sanger, and as security therefor the firm held two certificates of said stock, of…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Martin v. . FunkNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
  2. First Nat. Bank of Boston v. MaineSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  3. MacDonald v. Plymouth County Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
  4. Weidhorn v. LevySupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  5. Hopper v. . SageNew York Court of Appeals · 1889

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Kelley v. RossiMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
  2. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. English Construction Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
  3. Piper v. ChildsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
  4. McMurdo v. GetterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
  5. Chief of Police of Dracut v. Town of DracutMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1970

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API