Legal Opinion

Hobart v. Ferebee

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided November 24, 2009No. 24885, 25081PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

[¶ 1.] George Ferebee appeals three orders awarding Steven Hobart attorney’s fees totaling $12,445.91 incurred in responding to a series of motions brought by Ferebee in a protection order ease. The appeals have been consolidated for purposes of briefing and a decision by this Court. 1 We affirm.

FACTS

Background

[¶ 2.] These appeals arise out of a longstanding feud between rural Pennington County neighbors George Ferebee (Fere-bee) and Steven Hobart (Hobart). The two men have had a series of serious disputes for well over two decades. During that time, they have exchanged numerous accusations…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. First National Bank of Minneapolis v. Kehn Ranch, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Sommervold v. GrevlosSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  3. People ex rel. L.S.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Dakota, Minnesota & Eastern Railroad v. AcuitySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Reaser v. ReaserSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Ferebee v. HobartSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Johnson v. MillerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Hiller v. HillerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2018
  4. Smizer v. DreySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
  5. Strong v. GantSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API