Legal Opinion

Strong v. Gant

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided February 12, 2014No. 26705PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GILBERTSON, Chief Justice.

[¶ 1.] Pro-se applicant appealed the circuit court’s award of attorney’s fees under SDCL 15-17-51 and costs and disbursements under SDCL 15-17-37, asserting: (1) that the circuit court was without jurisdiction to award attorney’s fees while her appeal of the underlying judgment on the merits was pending, and (2) the circuit court was without authority to tax costs and disbursements absent a request for a hearing by her.

Facts and Procedural History

[¶2.] On August 27, 2012, Stephanie Strong, acting pro se, submitted an affidavit and application for a writ of mandamus…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Caneva v. Miners and Merchants BankSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Ridley v. Lawrence County CommissionSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Baltodano v. North Central Health Services, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Reaser v. ReaserSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
  5. City of Watertown v. Dakota, Minnesota & Eastern RailroadSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In Re the Estate of BickelSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Reidburn v. Dep't of Labor & RegulationSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2024
  3. State v. HorseSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2024
  4. Estate of BickelSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
  5. Interest of A.L. and D.L.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API