Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Hiller v. Hiller

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided October 24, 2018No. 28294PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSalter, Justice

[¶ 1.] After finding James Hiller in contempt for violating the provisions of a visitation order, the circuit court ordered James to pay attorney fees incurred by his former spouse, Jennifer Hiller. In an ensuing proceeding to change custody, the court ordered James to pay additional attorney fees to Jennifer along with expert witness fees. James appeals both orders. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand.

Facts and Procedural History

[¶ 2.] James and Jennifer were divorced in 2013 following a court trial. One area of evidence developed during the trial concerned Jennifer's relationship…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Crisman v. Determan Chiropractic, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Sazama v. State Ex Rel. MuilenbergSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Thurman v. Cuna Mutual Insurance SocietySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
  4. Swanson & Youngdale, Inc. v. Seagrave Corporation, a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1977
  5. Keller v. KellerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Taylor v. TaylorSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
  2. Taylor v. TaylorSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
  3. Uhre Realty v. TronnesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2024
  4. Evens v. EvensSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020
  5. Bruggeman v. RamosSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2022

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API