Legal Opinion

Smizer v. Drey

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided January 6, 2016No. 27192PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILBUR, Justice.

[¶ 1.] Dorothy Smizer, in her individual capacity and as personal representative of the estate-of Harlan Smizer, appeals the circuit court’s decision to impose sanctions under SDCL 15-6-ll(c). The circuit court awarded Christina Drey attorney’s fees as, sanctions after the court concluded that the Smizers did not conduct a reasonable investigation in law or fact to support their claim for punitive damages against Christina. The court also imposed sanctions, because it found that the Smizers improperly sought punitive damages to gain leverage toward settlement of their…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. Steve Rodgers v. Lincoln Towing Service, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
  3. Dahl v. SittnerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Isaac v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Kjerstad v. Ravellette Publications, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1994

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Wright v. TempleSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2021
  2. Dissolution of Healy Ranch, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2026
  3. Espinoza v. FowlerDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2023
  4. Giesler v. HirchertDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2018
  5. Jewell v. Sunshine Towing, LLCDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2025

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API