Legal Opinion
Dakota, Minnesota & Eastern Railroad v. Acuity
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided August 9, 2006No. 23601PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LOVRIEN, Circuit Judge.
[¶ 1.] Dakota, Minnesota and Eastern Railroad (DM & E) sued its automobile insurance company, Acuity, alleging that the negligence of an unidentified and uninsured motorist caused an accident involving a vehicle driven by DM & E employee Julian Olson (Olson) and that the business automobile policy issued by Acuity to DM & E covered the loss. A Beadle County jury found for DM & E and the trial court entered judgment accordingly. We affirm.
FACTS AND PROCEDURE
[If 2.] On July 28, 1998, DM & E employee Olson was operating a motor vehicle within the scope of his employment on…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- New Hampshire v. MaineSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Commissioner v. SunnenSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Cromwell v. County of SacSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Southern Pacific Railroad v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Mercoid Corp. v. Mid-Continent Investment Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Dakota, Minnesota & Eastern Railroad v. AcuitySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
- Matthews v. South Dakota Department of Social ServicesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
- Bret Healy v. Albert FoxCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2022
- Healy Ranch v. HealySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2022
- JAS Enterprises, Inc. v. BBS Enterprises, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.