Legal Opinion

Barth-Wittmore Insurance v. H. R. Murphy Enterprises, Inc.

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 10, 1985No. B004539PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

LILLIE, P. J.

Cross-defendants and cross-complainants, Barth-Wittmore Insurance et al., appeal from order dismissing a cross-complaint for declaratory relief, finding that a settlement was made in good faith and specifying certain issues to be without substantial controversy. We have determined that the order purportedly appealed from is not an appealable order.

I

Facts

H. R. Murphy Enterprises, Inc. (Murphy) entered into a contract with Thums Long Beach Company (Thums) to transport and haul oil field equipment to and from various Thums operating sites. The contract provided that Murphy…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Tech-Bilt, Inc. v. Woodward-Clyde & AssociatesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Griffith Co. v. San Diego College for WomenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  3. River Garden Farms, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
  4. Stambaugh v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
  5. In Re MGM Grand Hotel Fire LitigationDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 1983

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Haskell v. CarliCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
  2. Little v. CFS Service Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1987
  3. Gates Rubber Co. v. UlmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
  4. Coppola v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
  5. Mullin Lumber Co. v. ChandlerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API