Legal Opinion

Little v. CFS Service Corp.

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 27, 1987No. B015176PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

LUCAS, Acting P. J.

Plaintiffs Little and Darmiento appeal from the decision of the court in a nonjury trial that the foreclosure sale at which their bid to purchase real property had been accepted was an attempted sale which was wholly void and which cannot be the basis for a cause of action for damages for breach of contract. We affirm the judgment.

Facts

The following facts are based on a stipulation by the parties. Additional facts are included in the discussion.

On July 25, 1978, Culver Federal Savings and Loan Association, a predecessor of defendant Coast Savings (Coast) made a real…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Garfinkle v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Wolfe v. LipsyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  3. Barth-Wittmore Insurance v. H. R. Murphy Enterprises, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1985
  4. Lancaster Security Investment Corp. v. KesslerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  5. Leonard v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Yvanova v. New Century Mortgage Corp.California Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Moeller v. Chun-Yen LienCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
  3. Nguyen v. CalhounCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
  4. Knapp v. DohertyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
  5. Melendrez v. D & I INVESTMENT, INC.California Court of Appeal · 2005

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API