Legal Opinion

Mullin Lumber Co. v. Chandler

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 25, 1986No. B013765PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

JOHNSON, J .

The issue in this appeal is whether a settling defendant must prove its own liability to the plaintiff in order to recover from concurrent tortfeasors in an action for equitable indemnity. We have concluded such a requirement would undermine the important public policies of maximizing recovery to the injured party, encouraging settlements and apportioning liability according to fault while advancing no legitimate interests of the alleged tortfeasors who did not settle. Therefore we reverse the judgment of nonsuit against Mullin Lumber Company in its action for equitable…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. American Motorcycle Assn. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Tech-Bilt, Inc. v. Woodward-Clyde & AssociatesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  3. E. L. White, Inc. v. City of Huntington BeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  4. People Ex Rel. Department of Transportation v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. International Harvester Co.California Court of Appeal · 1978

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Galt G/S v. JSS ScandinaviaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
  2. Western Steamship Lines, Inc. v. San Pedro Peninsula HospitalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Golden Eagle Insurance v. Foremost InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
  4. Peter Culley & Associates v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
  5. Chenery v. Agri-Lines Corp.Idaho Supreme Court · 1988

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API