Legal Opinion

Garrett v. Reid-Cashion Land & Cattle Company

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided December 17, 1928No. Civil No. 2630PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRoss, C. J.

The appellee has moved for a rehearing. The only point made by motion that we believe merits attention is as to whether the judgment we directed is proper.

On the main questions of law and our disposition of them we are satisfied. We can see no profit in re-arguing or restating them.

After citing the order of remand, as found in our opinion, the motion for rehearing proceeds:

“ ... It is evident that there must be a modification of the order of the court quoted above, inasmuch as one of the main questions in this case, i. e., whether or not the adult plaintiffs were mistaken as to their legal…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Slocum v. New York Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  2. Arizona Binghampton Copper Co. v. DicksonArizona Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Hopkins v. RailroadTennessee Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Haupt v. Maricopa CountyArizona Supreme Court · 1902
  5. McPherson v. HattichArizona Supreme Court · 1906

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Fagerberg v. Phoenix Flour Mills Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1937
  2. City of Tucson v. O'Rielly Motor Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Hammond v. A. J. Bayless Markets, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Little v. BrownArizona Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Robinson v. LehnertArizona Supreme Court · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API