Legal Opinion

City of Tucson v. O'Rielly Motor Co.

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided April 22, 1946No. 4775PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STANFORD, Chief Justice.

We will style the parties as they appeared in the superior court.

Judgment was given in the trial court by direction to jury of verdict for plaintiff for damages caused by negligence of defendant in permitting the property of plaintiff to be flooded as hereinafter set forth. After plaintiff’s case was finished defendant rested without offering testimony. A motion by plaintiff for a directed verdict was granted; judgment was entered and it was from said judgment and the court’s denial of defendant’s motion for a new trial that this appeal is brought to this court.

Through…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Slocum v. New York Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  2. Ramberg v. MorganSupreme Court of Iowa · 1928
  3. Seiler v. WhitingArizona Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Patty v. Salem Flouring Mills Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Fagerberg v. Phoenix Flour Mills Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1937

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. City of Tucson v. KoerberArizona Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Taylor v. Roosevelt Irr. Dist.Arizona Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Kreisman v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1970
  4. Dykeman v. AshtonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1968
  5. Anderson Aviation Sales Company, Inc. v. PerezCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1973

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API