Legal Opinion

Akro-Plastics v. Drake Industries

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided October 7, 1996No. 95-P-0157PublishedCited by 63 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Nader, Judge.

This is an accelerated appeal from summary judgment rendered in the Portage County Court of Common Pleas in favor of plaintiff-appellee, Akro-Plastics, and against defendant-appellant, Drake Industries (“Drake”).

Akro-Plastics manufactures backboards that are fitted into medical stretchers at its facility in Kent, Ohio. Sometime in early 1993, Akro-Plastics and Drake entered into an oral agreement whereby Drake would pick up large shipments of stretcher backboards at the Kent facility and take them to its own facility in Constantine, Michigan. There, Drake promised to inject foam…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Dresher v. BurtOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Knapp v. Edwards LaboratoriesOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Mitseff v. WheelerOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Welco Industries, Inc. v. Applied CompaniesOhio Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Columbus Finance, Inc. v. HowardOhio Supreme Court · 1975

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by63 opinions

  1. Glidden Co. v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Hansel v. Creative Concrete & Masonry Construction Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2002
  3. Chuang Dev. L.L.C. v. RainaOhio Court of Appeals · 2017
  4. Mécanique C.N.C., Inc. v. Durr Environmental, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2004
  5. Gouge v. BAX Global, Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2003

58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API