Legal Opinion

Hansel v. Creative Concrete & Masonry Construction Co.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided January 24, 2002No. 01AP-689 (REGULAR CALENDAR)PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Tyack, Presiding Judge.

{¶ 1} On August 19, 1999, Michael and Carolyn Hansel filed a complaint in the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas against Creative Concrete & Masonry Construction Company (“Creative Concrete”). The parties had entered into a contract for the installation of a 4.5-inch-thick concrete driveway at the Hansels’ residence. The complaint averred that shortly after the work was completed, the Hansels discovered that the thickness of the concrete driveway was not as agreed upon and that there was no gravel base under most of the driveway. The complaint set forth claims of…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Seasons Coal Co. v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  2. C. E. Morris Co. v. Foley Construction Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Akro-Plastics v. Drake IndustriesOhio Court of Appeals · 1996
  4. Barton v. EllisOhio Court of Appeals · 1986
  5. Sturm v. SturmOhio Supreme Court · 1992

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Becker v. Direct Energy, LPOhio Court of Appeals · 2018
  2. O'Brien v. Ohio State University, 06ap-946 (9-20-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
  3. Stonehenge Land Co. v. Beazer Homes Investments, L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
  4. Hanna v. Groom, 07ap-502 (2-26-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
  5. Crest Inc. v. Costco Wholesale Corp.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2005

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API