Legal Opinion

Columbus Finance, Inc. v. Howard

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 30, 1975No. 74-152PublishedCited by 165 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Neill, C. J.

Columbas Finance has not contested those portions of the trial court’s judgment denying recovery on the two cognovit notes and awarding the Howards compensatory damages for loss of use of their automobile. These matters are, therefore, not at issue in this appeal; that Columbus Finance wrongfully executed on the Howards’ automobile is established.* What is at issue is the availability, in an action for wrongful execution, of two *183categories of money damages: punitive damages and compensatory damages for mental suffering and humiliation. Since wrongful execution is a tort action, the resolution…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Pryor v. WebberOhio Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Saberton v. GreenwaldOhio Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Hitchcock v. Board of Home MissionsIllinois Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Stone v. C. I. T. Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  5. Anderson v. SloaneWisconsin Supreme Court · 1888

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by165 opinions

  1. Preston v. MurtyOhio Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Hoskins v. Aetna Life InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Zoppo v. Homestead InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Jones v. VIP Development Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Galmish v. CicchiniOhio Supreme Court · 2000

160 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API