Legal Opinion

In Re Van Buren Plaza, LLC

United States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. California

Decided September 9, 1996No. Bankruptcy SA 95-10250 JWPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION

JOHN J. WILSON, Bankruptcy Judge.

At issue before the court is California’s law on accord and satisfaction. Debtor Van Bu-rén Plaza, LLC, (the “Debtor”) seeks an order disallowing the claim filed by Ironstone Group, Inc. (“Ironstone”) on the ground that accord and satisfaction had been reached resolving Ironstone’s claim, whereas Ironstone contends that the parties never settled the claim by an accord and satisfaction under California law.

I. STATEMENT OF FACTS

On June 26, 1992, the Debtor entered into a contract with Ironstone, according to which Ironstone would perform…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Potter v. Pacific Coast Lumber Co.California Supreme Court · 1951
  2. B. & W. Engineering Co. v. BeamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913
  3. Armco Inc. v. Glenfed Financial Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1989
  4. Red Alarm, Inc. v. Waycrosse, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Directors Guild of America v. Harmony Pictures, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 1998
  2. Woolridge v. J.F.L. Electric, Inc.Appellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 2002
  3. Woolridge v. JFL Electric, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API