Legal Opinion
Red Alarm, Inc. v. Waycrosse, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided February 7, 1995No. 93-16087PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HUG, Circuit Judge:
The issue in this case is whether the district court erred in granting summary judgment against Red Alarm on its claim that a “settlement check” sent to Silent Knight constituted an accord and satisfaction between the parties. We agree with the district court and affirm.
FACTS
Shent Knight manufactures security alarm equipment. Red Alarm purchases security alarm equipment and instahs alarm systems on the premises of its customers. In 1988, Red Alarm and Shent Knight negotiated an agreement under which Red Alarm would purchase its security equipment from Silent Knight. Shent…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Jeanette Jesinger v. Nevada Federal Credit Union, a Federally-Chartered Credit Union Robert W. FleischmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- William Michael Jones v. Union Pacific Railroad Company, United Transportation UnionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Moving Picture MacHine Operators Union Local No. 162 v. Glasgow Theaters, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1970
- Teledyne Mid-America Corporation, a Delaware Corporation v. Hoh Corporation, a Hawaii CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973
- Grayhill Drilling Co. v. Superior Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1952
3Cited by3 opinions
- Directors Guild of America v. Harmony Pictures, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 1998
- In Re Van Buren Plaza, LLCUnited States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. California · 1996
- Red Alarm, Inc. v. Waycrosse, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995