Legal Opinion
Samsung Electronics America, Inc. v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided February 3, 1997No. 96-1127PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the court filed by Circuit Judge MICHEL. Dissenting opinion filed by Circuit Judge MAYER.
MICHEL, Circuit Judge.
Samsung Electronics America, Inc. (“Samsung”) appeals from the Order of the United States Court of International Trade entered October 26, 1995 in Samsung Electronics America, Inc. v. United States, 904 F.Supp. 1403 (C.I.T. 1995), in which the trade court (a) denied Samsung’s motion for summary judgment on its claims for duty refunds due to the diminution in value of merchandise it imported from its parent corporation, the manufacturer, that contained latent manufacturing…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- C. Sanchez and Son, Incorporated v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
- Interstate General Government Contractors, Inc. v. Michael P.W. Stone, Secretary of the ArmyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
- Ralden Partnership v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1989
- Samsung Electronics America, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1995
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- San Carlos Irrigation and Drainage District v. The United States, Defendant/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
- Nan Ya Plastics Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
- Saab Cars Usa, Inc. v. United States, Defendant-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Ryco Construction, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2002
- Samsung Electronics America, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.