Legal Opinion
Ralden Partnership v. The United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided December 14, 1989No. 88-1269PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ARCHER, Circuit Judge.
Ralden Partnership (Ralden) appeals the decision of the Interior Board of Contract Appeals (Board) dated July 1, 1987, IBCA No. 2116, which became final by Order of the Board on December 1, 1987, holding that Ralden is not entitled to, and must repay to the United States (government), the rents received in 1981-1985 under Lease No. HSM-110-69-281 and Supplement Lease Agreements (SLAs) to the extent such rents exceeded the limitation in section 322 of the Economy Act of 1932, 40 U.S.C. § 278a (1982). We affirm.
I
The decision of the Board was based on undisputed facts.…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Udall v. TallmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Red Lion Broadcasting Co. v. Federal Communications CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- National Labor Relations Board v. Bell Aerospace Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Beta Systems, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- The Firestone Tire & Rubber Company v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1971
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Precision Pine & Timber, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2001
- Edwards v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1990
- Ocean Technology, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1990
- Melex USA, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1995
- Samsung Electronics America, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.