City of Enid v. Crow
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
JACKSON, Justice.
This is an action for damages. It stems from the taking or withdrawal of percolating underground waters for sale off the premises, resulting in alleged reduction of water supply and permanent damages to plaintiffs’ adjacent property.
The parties will be referred to as they appeared in the trial court.
Plaintiffs, Frank W. Crow and Frances M. Crow, own and occupy as their homestead a 160 acre farm in Major county. By virtue of a lease agreement defendant, The City of Enid, acquired subterranean water rights on an adjoining farm, on which it drilled a water well in February of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Meeker v. City of East OrangeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1909
- Chickasha Cotton Oil Company v. HancockSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1957
- Canada v. City of ShawneeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
- Oklahoma City v. WestSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
- St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. Farmers' Union Gin Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Jarvis v. State Land DepartmentArizona Supreme Court · 1970
- Martin v. City of LindenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1995
- Goetz v. Security Industrial BankColorado Court of Appeals · 1973
- Volkmann v. City of CrosbyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1963
- Tulsa Municipal Airport Trust v. National Gypsum Co.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1976
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.