Chickasha Cotton Oil Company v. Hancock
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
BLACKBIRD, Justice.
In the action, out of which this appeal arose, defendants in error, partners in the ranching and cattle-raising business, obtained a general verdict and judgment in the amount of $17,000 against plaintiffs in error, as defendants, for injuries to some, and the death of other, cattle of their herd. In the *333present appeal by said defendants to reverse said judgment, 'both they and their adversaries will be referred to as they appeared in the trial court.
Plaintiffs’ recovery was upon the theory that the cattle’s deaths and injuries had been caused by a disease called…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Davis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Phillips v. Newport Et Ux.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1945
- Swift & Co. v. Morgan & SturdivantCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1954
- Montgomery Ward & Co. v. LevyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1940
- Strahm v. MurrySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1948
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Kirkland v. General Motors CorporationSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1974
- Marathon Battery Company v. KilpatrickSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1965
- Dutsch v. Sea Ray Boats, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
- Missouri-Kansas-Texas Railroad Company v. JonesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960
- Wagner v. Coronet HotelCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1969
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.