Legal Opinion

Volkmann v. City of Crosby

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided February 21, 1963No. 8028PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MORRIS, Chief Justice.

This is an action to enjoin the defendants from drawing or permitting the drawing or pumping of enough water from a well located on a right-of-way of the Great Northern Railway Company across the Northwest Quarter (NWJ4) of Section Thirty-five (35), in Township One Hundred Sixty-three (163) of Range Ninety-seven (97) to impair or reduce the flow of an artesian well located upon land constituting a part of the Estate of Andrew Volkmann, deceased, until the defendant City of Crosby has taken the right to impair or destroy the flow of the artesian well by contract or…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Katz v. WalkinshawCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Bristor v. CheathamArizona Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Bigelow v. DraperNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Meeker v. City of East OrangeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1909
  5. Nichols v. McIntoshSupreme Court of Colorado · 1893

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Jarvis v. State Land DepartmentArizona Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Baeth v. HoisveenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Martin v. City of LindenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1995
  4. McNamara v. City of RittmanOhio Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Undlin v. City of SurreyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1978

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API