Oklahoma City v. West
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the CourtSwindall, J.
The nuisance complained of was the turning of unpurified sewage into the river at Oklahoma City to the damage of the plaintiff as a riparian owner, and the petition contained the usual allegation that the nuisance could be abated by the expenditure of money, and it was alleged that the damage would continue until abatement. The petition contained an admission that a prior action had been settled by a stipulation which allowed a certain sum as damages sustained from the nuisance up to April 15, 1928, judgment for that sum having been rendered pursuant to the stipulation. It was also alleged…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Baltimore & Potomac Railroad v. Fifth Baptist ChurchSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- City of Ardmore v. OrrSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Platt Bros. v. City of WaterburySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1900
- Donahoe v. Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1897
- Thurston v. City of St. JosephSupreme Court of Missouri · 1873
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Ryan v. City of EmmetsburgSupreme Court of Iowa · 1942
- Riggs v. City of SpringfieldSupreme Court of Missouri · 1939
- Stewart v. City of SpringfieldSupreme Court of Missouri · 1942
- Oklahoma City v. EylarSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
- Oklahoma City v. TyteniczSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.