Legal Opinion

Martin v. City of Linden

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided September 15, 1995No. 1940251, 1940374PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

These consolidated appeals involve a dispute between a municipality and a landowner over the reasonable use of a common aquifer, or bed of groundwater, that lies beneath the property of both. The specific question is whether the City of Linden can drill a permanent well on a one-acre tract of land it owns outside its municipal limits, and pump the water by pipeline at an estimated rate of 700 gallons per minute or 500,000 gallons per day to the City, which is located approximately 15 miles from the site of the well, for use by its consumers. In addition to the issue whether the City should be…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. West v. Founders Life Assur. Co. of FloridaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  2. Bass v. SOUTHTRUST BANK OF BALDWIN CTY.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  3. Hanners v. Balfour Guthrie, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1990
  4. Bussey v. John Deere Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1988
  5. Sloss-Sheffield Steel & Iron Co. v. WilkesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Ormco Corp. v. JohnsSupreme Court of Alabama · 2003
  2. Ala. Plating v. US Fidelity and Guar.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1997
  3. Ex parte B2K Systems, LLC Ingenuity International, LLC and Robert A. Przybysz.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2014
  4. Monte Sano Research Corp. v. Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2012
  5. Ex Parte Caribe, U.S.A., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1997

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API