Legal Opinion
G & K Dairy v. Princeton Electric Plant Board
District Court, W.D. Kentucky
Decided September 25, 1991No. Civ. A. C-89-0255-P(S)PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
SILER, Circuit. Judge, Sitting by Designation.
INTRODUCTION
The defendant moved the Court for summary judgment in this personal property damage action. For the following reasons, the Court will grant the motion in part and deny it in part.
I. SUMMARY JUDGMENT STANDARD.
Summary judgment shall be granted only “if the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions ..., together with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.” Fed. R.Civ.P. 56(c); see also…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,768 Phil A. Street and Clyde H. Street v. J.C. Bradford & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Rockwell International Corp. v. WilhiteCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2003
- Hegg v. Hawkeye Tri-County RECSupreme Court of Iowa · 1994
- Balke v. Central Missouri Electric CooperativeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998
- In Re Pilgrim's Pride Corp.United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Texas · 2009
- Bryant v. Tri-County Electric Membership Corp.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1994
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.